Written by Kenneth W. Milano Dec. 1, 2015, posted to http://www.starnewsphilly.com/.
This month we celebrated the 333rd Anniversary of William Penn’s Treaty with the Native Americans at Shackamaxon (Penn Treaty Park), but just when did Penn’s Treaty actually take place?
William Penn’s memorable treaty with Tamanend and other Delaware chiefs under the “Great Elm Tree” at Shackamaxon has always been filled with romantic interest. Historian C. Hale Sipe tells us that Penn, unarmed, clad in his somber Quaker garb, addressed the assembled Native Americans, uttering the following words, which have been admired ever since:
We meet on the broad pathway of good faith and good-will; no advantage shall be taken on either side, but all shall be openness and love. We are the same as if one man’s body was to be divided into two parts; we are of one flesh and one blood.
The reply of Tamanend is said to be equally noble:
We will live in love with William Penn and his children as long as the creeks and rivers run, and while the sun, moon, and stars endure.
There is no actual record of the “Great Treaty,” the treaty made familiar to many by Benjamin West’s painting and Voltaire’s allusion to it “as the only treaty never sworn to and never broken.” The symbolism of the “Treaty Tree” has laid its mark on the American landscape as centuries of artists have looked to it for inspiration.
The lack of agreement among historians as to the time when the event took place also adds to the confusion of its authenticity. Most accounts claim that it took place in late November 1682, shortly after Penn arrived in the colony. “Under the shelter of the forest,” to quote the American historian George Bancroft, “now leafless by the frosts of autumn, Penn proclaimed to the men of the Algonquin race, from both banks of the Delaware, from the borders of the Schuylkill, and…even from the Susquehanna.”
Some historians actually place the date of the treaty as June 23, 1683, when Penn purchased two tracts of land from Tamanend and his associates, with the assumption that the transaction and the Great Treaty took place at the same time and place, even though a treaty of “amity and friendship” need not have included an exchange of land.
Historian Howard Malcom Jenkins makes mention of Penn’s Treaty in his multivolume work on Pennsylvania, “Pennsylvania, Colonial and Federal,” published in 1903:
The Indians preserved the tradition of an agreement of peace made with Penn, and it was many times recalled in the meetings held with him and his successors. Some of these allusions are very definite. In 1715, for example, an important delegation of the Lenape chiefs came to Philadelphia to visit the Governor. Sassoonan—afterward called Allummapees, and for many years the principal chief of his people—was at the head, and Opessah, a Shawnee chief, accompanied him. There was “great ceremony,” says the Council record, over the “opening of the calumet.” Rattles were shaken, and songs were chanted. Then Sassoonan spoke, offering the calumet to Governor Gookin, who in his speech spoke of “that firm Peace that was settled between William Penn, the founder and chief governor of this country, at his first coming into it,” to which Sassoonan replied that they had come “to renew the former bond of friendship; that William Penn had at his first coming made a clear and open road all the way to the Indians, and they desired the same might be kept open and that all obstructions might be removed.”
Mentioning that the peace was first made upon Penn’s coming to the colony would place the Peace Treaty in 1682 rather than 1683—would Penn really wait from October 1682 to June 1683 to make treaty with the Native Americans?
In 1720, Governor William Keith, writing to the Iroquois chiefs of New York, noted, “When Governor Penn first settled this country he made it his first care to cultivate a strict alliance and friendship with all the Indians, and condescended so far as to purchase his lands from them.”
And in March 1722, the colonial authorities sent a message to the Senecas, writing, “William Penn made a firm peace and league with the Indians in these parts near forty years ago, which league has often been repeated and never broken.”
In fact the Great Treaty was never broken until the Penn’s Creek Massacre of October 16, 1755.
According to the historian C. Hale Sipe, the Great Treaty was “preserved by the head chiefs of the Turtle Clan of Delawares for generations.” On March 24, 1782, Chief Killbuck is said to have lost the historic wampum that contained the treaty that Tamanend and others had made with Penn one hundred years previously. He had been forced to flee to Fort Pitt to escape death at the hands of the Scotch-Irish settlers from Chartiers Creek who attacked him and other friendly Delawares at Smoky Island, also called Killbuck’s Island, in the Ohio River, near Fort Pitt.
The Great Treaty at Shackamaxon, as Sipe states, occupies a “high and glorious place in the Indian history and traditions of Pennsylvania and the Nation. Though the historian labors in vain to establish the date, the fact of the treaty remains as inspiring to us of the present days as it was to the historians, painters, and poets of the past.” For artists around the world, Penn’s Treaty became a symbol and an inspiration that would keep them busy for centuries after.
Contact Star at [email protected].
Comments(2)
thesis writing service says:
December 24, 2015 at 8:51 amSome scholastic pundits, particularly commentators of West’s work of art, contend that the convention was concocted to romanticize Pennsylvania’s past. Others propose that it joins the recollections of numerous reported bargains and arrive buys, or that it magnifies a solitary such meeting into a Great Treaty. One conceivable premise is a settlement in June 1683 that brought about a few area deeds marked by Penn and the Lenape pioneer Tamanend (the fabulous “Tammany”), among others
Kenneth W Milano says:
April 14, 2019 at 12:33 pmI have always believed that the Treaty of Amity & Friendship between Penn and the Native Americans at Shackamaxon, was kind of like today’s treaties, where before the parties sit down to hammer out details and sign the treaty, you meet, have some cocktails, dinner, conversation, perhaps with spouses of ambassadors, leaders, etc., then the next day you get down to business. Penn’s Treaty of Amity & Friendship for me fits into this category of meetings and promises. Scholars were always looking for the “signed” document, and since it was not found, the treaty did not exist. If you ask the descendants of the Native Americans whose ancestors who treated with Penn, they will tell you the Wampum Belt is that document.